iblog

It’s official: organic food really is better than non-organic food. A new study funded by the European Union has found startling differences between the nutritional content of the two types. The study which cost £12m and lasted four years is the biggest ever study into organic foods and it has found that not only is organic food “more nutritious” than ordinary produce but eating it may actually lengthen people’s lives. It is hoped that these results will finally settle the long debate over whether organic food really is what government calls “a lifestyle choice” or actually something scientifically shown to be better for you.

The research found that organic fruits and vegetables contain as much as 40% more antioxidants than ordinary food. Antioxidants have long been known to protect against killer diseases such as cancer and heart disease. Not only that but they also have higher levels of important minerals such as iron and zinc. In fact, head researcher on the project Professor Carlo Leifert said that the difference was so great that eating organic would even compensate for not eating the five recommended portions of fruits and vegetables a day. He says:

“If you have just 20% more antioxidants and you can’t get your kids to do five a day, then you might just be okay with four a day.”

Furthermore, the study has also found that even in milk, the antioxidants from organic herds were up to 90% higher than milk from ordinary herds.

These results show that the government was most likely wrong when it claimed that there was no significant effect of having organic foods. Now the Food Standards Agency has confirmed that it is reviewing the above evidence before considering changing its official advice to consumers.

This entry was posted on Sunday, October 28th, 2007 at 1:38 pm and is filed under Lifestyle, Environment, Science, Health, Nature. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.