<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>iblog &#187; Mark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iblog.co.uk/author/mark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iblog.co.uk</link>
	<description>(so you don't have to)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:40:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Pluto</title>
		<link>http://www.iblog.co.uk/2006/09/04/pluto/</link>
		<comments>http://www.iblog.co.uk/2006/09/04/pluto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 23:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iblog.co.uk/2006/09/04/pluto/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much fervour has been generated  by the recent demotion of Pluto to merely &#8216;dwarf&#8217; status among the other planets of the solar system. Large protests are forming against the draft resolution voted in by a fraction of the members of the International Astronomical Union (IAU), generally claiming the new definition to be &#8216;fundamentally flawed&#8217;.
Dr [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/5283956.stm">Much</a> <a href="http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/060831_planet_definition.html">fervour</a> has <a href="http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/08/31/2764.aspx">been generated</a> <a href="http://www.livescience.com/blogs/2006/08/31/300-astronomers-wont-use-new-planet-definition/"></a> by the <a href="http://www.iau2006.org/mirror/www.iau.org/iau0601/iau0601_release.html">recent demotion of Pluto</a> to merely &#8216;dwarf&#8217; status among the other planets of the solar system. <a href="http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/planetprotest/">Large</a> <a href="http://www.livescience.com/blogs/2006/08/31/300-astronomers-wont-use-new-planet-definition/">protests</a> are forming against the draft resolution voted in by a fraction of the members of the International Astronomical Union (IAU), generally claiming the new definition to be &#8216;fundamentally flawed&#8217;.</p>
<p>Dr Alan Stern, head of the New Horizons mission to Pluto, said &#8220;[...] it is impossible and contrived to put a dividing line between dwarf planets and planets.&#8221;, which is a valid point: after all, it did take <em>two years&#8217;</em> worth of work, as the IAU proudly claims, to arrive at this controversial decision.</p>
<p>How on Earth could it take so long to define &#8216;planet&#8217;? More to the point, was it worth it? Celestial bodies come in all shapes and sizes and orbital configurations; surely, by drawing such fine lines, only more time will be wasted in argument over whether the next big rock passing through Hubble&#8217;s gaze is a planet or a pluton. There are more important questions to be asking: is it made of cheese?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iblog.co.uk/2006/09/04/pluto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

