Anti-Microsoft fanatics continue to pick flaws
Saturday, May 5th, 2007
Virgil: How many times have you been assaulted by some geek or geeky advert saying “Get Firefox! It’s better than Internet Explorer, faster, safer, and it’s standard’s compliant!” (Just so you know, Firefox is a web browser published by a non-Microsoft company.) Likewise, how many times have you heard a similar line deriding Windows? “Run Linux, it’s cheaper, more stable, and more secure!” or “Mac OS is smoother, faster, and more user-friendly!”
If these “alternatives” were really so good, why are they not as popular as the Windows variants? I remember when I first came across the Get Firefox campaign. I thought, wow, I’ve been blissfully unaware, but I’m joining the revolution! I downloaded it and had loads of fun. But then I realised that the product was slower and had less features (possibly because they don’t have the cash Microsoft have), and was incompatible with everything else I was using.
I recently got a new PC with Windows Vista pre-installed, and I think it’s fantastic. It’s pretty, user-friendly, organised, neat, fast, responsive… I could go on. What on earth could be so bad about it that people the net wide have to label it “crippleware” that can barely keep up with the competition? For all I care, the ridiculously-named Ubuntu can support the MegaRidiculous WhoCares Standard v7.3 all it likes, my Windows does the job perfectly well and doesn’t need geeky campaigns to attest its worth.





