Matthew: As a casual, social smoker, I am enjoying a guilt free last couple of months of smoking before I will no longer be allowed to smoke in the only environment I really want to; bars and clubs. When the initiative was announced, I was incensed by the government's unwelcome intrusion into my personal life, and as a liberal, I argued that the decision to smoke or not should be made by individuals rather than the state. As someone who has worked in bars and pubs, I had accepted the smokey working conditions as a kind of 'occupational hazard', without questioning whether I was right or not to do so.
However, having looking at the practical elements of this legislation rather than the principle (which I am still not happy with), I am persuaded that this particular intrusion of the state into my life is for the best. I will stop smoking, thus saving some money and improving my health. I will not come back from nights out smelling of smoke (probably beer and sweat instead). Much as I am instinctively opposed to the statement; perhaps, where individuals are consistently making poor choices (poor by a rational, consensus assesment) the state should take action.